The USA is currently in the hot phase of a coup d’etat, the pattern of which is already known globally: judges who were nominated and pushed through by the left are carrying out one coup d’etat after another around the world and establishing a global judicial junta that is trying to abolish the separation of powers and democracy. Election results are irrelevant. Political judgments are made behind closed doors. That is the new reality in the world.
This strategy is also called lawfare and a global pattern can clearly be seen. The question arises whether we are dealing with a global conspiracy of judges here. There are three associations globally that have been dealing with issues such as social justice, DEI and climate change for around a decade instead of classic legal issues.
It is a small circle with a lot of power that meets annually at the various meetings and conferences of these organizations. And it is not necessarily transparent.
Currently, in the United States, we have the following scenario unfolding.
Amuse described the plot on X: “In an egregious and unconstitutional assault on executive authority, Judge Paul Engelmayer has unilaterally forbidden all of Trump’s political appointees—including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent—from accessing Treasury Department data. This ruling, concocted without legal precedent or constitutional justification, is nothing short of judicial sabotage. Worse, it was issued ex parte—meaning Trump administration lawyers weren’t given notice, weren’t allowed to argue, and weren’t even in the room. Only Democrat attorneys general were heard, ensuring a predetermined outcome. Engelmayer’s order is legally indefensible. He cites no statutory basis because none exists. He offers no constitutional rationale because the Constitution directly contradicts him. Instead, he fabricates a fiction: that the duly appointed Treasury Secretary is nothing more than a ceremonial figurehead, akin to a powerless monarch, while unelected bureaucrats—who answer to no voters—control the nation’s finances. This is judicial tyranny masquerading as jurisprudence. The implications are staggering. By stripping the executive branch of access to its own financial data, this ruling effectively transfers control of the federal purse to the permanent bureaucracy—the so-called “deep state.” That is a direct assault on the Constitution’s separation of powers, which vests executive authority in the elected President and his appointees, not in career government employees. (…)”
“The lawsuit, led by New York Attorney General Letitia James (D), says DOGE, a group operating under the direction of President Donald Trump, had no authority to access the Treasury Department’s systems and that doing so was a potentially massive cybersecurity and privacy risk”, wrote Washington Post.
However, WP is wrong with its assessment. The fact is that the judge has no authority to cancel the separation of powers and Musk was empowered by the President. Why? In the USA there is the rule of ‘We the people’ which can potentially override all institutions and laws, even take out the President who represents this will of the ‘We the people’.
As long as ‘We the people” do not take out directly the President, the President acts with authority and on behalf of ‘We the people’. And ‘We the people’ have the last say.
As to the moment, the White House did not react.
A hearing is scheduled for February 14th, in about a week. It is a completely impossible situation to shut down the elected government and Congress for this period.
Even more, this pattern/figure of argumentation can be extended to any area and thus paralyze the Trump II administration for the next four years with an endless chain of ‘lawfare’.
A fundamental solution must be found here. One of the solutions is to arrest the judges on charges of high treason and conspiracy against the government and the American people.